Automated testings I'll leave for some future post.ĭownload page for Ovaldi is here. In the text that follows I'm going to describe a process of installing, manually running the tool and analyzing the results. The reason that I believe that its use on workstations and servers on a periodic basis will make those computers more secure, and, by extension, the whole system more secure. I was testing ovaldi on Linux before with mixed success, but now I decided to try it on Windows 7. HTML is great for viewing results, while XML for parsing and automating scans. Ovaldi interprets (in a way) given database and produces reports, in XML and HTML formats. Ovaldi, on the other hand, is free, but you are forced to use command line. Some security vendors have their own versions, which of course cost money. And here we have open source reference implementation, Ovaldi. In themselves, those checks are worthless without a proper tool that will execute them. Finally, you can add your own checks customized to your particular environment. The tests are provided by some vendors (like RedHat) and also by community. There are many existing checks defined, for example, here are latest additions and updates, while here are complete databases for download. depend on a system under audit, or if a particular component is installed or not), and they can be grouped with operators like AND, OR and NOT. OVAL is basically a language that describes checks to be made, more concretely, it's an application of XML.
#ARPWATCH FOR WINDOWS 7 MANUAL#
In that way you can check larger sample of systems and achieve better accuracy and confidence in obtained results than by manual checks. auditor, you can also benefit from OVAL since checks that you have to perform could be in some way prescribed and automated. That tool could be OVAL.īut even if you are not an system administrator, but e.g. Since such checks are time consuming and error prone, it is a good practice to use some tool that will do it for you. So, it is important to perform regular checks in order to spot changes. But, any unintended change might bring system into a risk. After you are finished, you might think that changes you've made won't influence anything and leave for some later time to reverse them, and eventually you'll forget about them. No matter if you are tweaking particular installation because user requested some new functionality or he requested removal of something that annoys him, or you are trying to diagnose why something worked and now it doesn't work, you will change something. Still, if those computers are used (and by definition they are, more or less frequently), then they are like living organisms, they change.
You may have automated updates and such, but they have to be checked from time to time in order to see if they function correctly. But, as the number of machines grows and becomes more heterogeneous, keeping them safe becomes very donating task. When you are dealing with a single computer with a particular operating system, it is relatively easy to keep it safe.
0 kommentar(er)
